How is spend analysis used in procurement?
Short answer
In procurement, spend analysis decides what to work on next: it turns purchasing data into a ranked list of sourcing, contract and compliance actions, each with a baseline for savings.
Key takeaways
- Procurement uses spend analysis to choose its next projects: which categories to tender, which suppliers to consolidate, which contracts to enforce and which purchases to move to simpler channels.
- Each finding points to a lever: fragmentation to consolidation, price differences to harmonisation, off-contract buying to compliance, small purchases to catalogues or cards, rising volumes to demand management.
- Opportunities are sized with the team’s own assumptions and ranked by value, effort and risk, then grouped into sourcing waves with an owner and a date.
- The figures from the analysis become the baseline. Savings, contract coverage and spend under management are measured against it at each refresh.
- Public buyers use the same work for legal duties, such as the UK pipeline notice or the US rule against splitting purchases below a threshold.
What does spend analysis do in procurement?
In procurement, spend analysis is used to decide where to act. It shows what the organisation buys, from whom, at what price and through which channel, then turns those findings into a ranked list of projects: tenders, supplier consolidation, contract enforcement and simpler buying routes. Its figures also become the baseline for measuring savings.
The data work, from extraction and cleaning to classification and the spend cube, is explained in what is spend analysis. This page starts where that work ends: with a clean view of spend, and a procurement team that must decide what to do with it. CIPS defines spend analytics as “the process of collecting, classifying and analysing expenditure data”. In a 2004 report, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that private companies use spend analysis as the foundation of a strategic approach to procurement.
A concrete case, using the fictional company of the worked example below, shows the difference. A spend report says the company spent €1.2 million on cleaning last year. That is a fact. Procurement use starts with the next questions: why are there 14 cleaning companies for 9 sites, why does the hourly rate vary from one site to another, and when do those contracts end?
Which procurement decisions does spend analysis feed?
Spend analysis feeds most of the decisions a procurement team makes during the year. The table links each decision to the question the data answers and a typical finding.
| Decision | Question the data answers | Typical finding |
|---|---|---|
| Annual sourcing plan | Which categories carry the most spend and the most suppliers? | Facilities services: large spend spread over many local suppliers |
| Supplier consolidation | Where is one need bought from many suppliers? | Five suppliers sell the same office chairs to five sites |
| Contract renewals | Which contracts end soon, and how much spend do they cover? | A €900,000 temporary staffing contract ends in seven months |
| Compliance actions | How much is bought outside existing contracts? | 40% of laptop spend bypasses the agreed supplier |
| Buying channels for small purchases | How many suppliers and invoices sit in the tail? | Hundreds of suppliers each paid once or twice a year |
| Demand management | Which volumes grow faster than activity? | Courier shipments up a third while orders shipped are flat |
| Supply risk | Where does a critical category depend on one supplier or one country? | One supplier holds all spend for a key component |
A spend analysis that does not change at least one of these decisions has produced a report, not a result.
The supplier view of the same data, ranking spend by parent company and deciding which suppliers to keep, is covered in supplier spend analysis.
What is the spend analysis process in procurement?
The spend analysis process in procurement runs as a cycle tied to the sourcing plan: decide what the analysis must answer, prepare the data, turn findings into opportunities, size and rank them, assign them to sourcing waves, then measure against the baseline and refresh. The data steps in the middle are the same as in any spend analysis.
- Start from the decision. For example: “Which five categories do we tender next year?” or “Where do we lose money outside contracts?” The question sets the scope, the period and the level of detail needed.
- Prepare the data: extract, clean, group suppliers and classify spend. The method is in what is spend analysis.
- Read the findings by category: spend, number of suppliers, contract coverage, price differences for the same item and the share bought outside contracts.
- Turn each finding into an opportunity with a lever: consolidate, tender, enforce a contract, change the buying channel, reduce demand or add a second source.
- Size and rank the opportunities by expected value, effort and risk, with the category owner.
- Assign the selected opportunities to sourcing waves in the category plan, each with an owner, a start date and a target.
- Fix the baseline, then refresh the analysis on a set schedule to measure savings, coverage and compliance against it.
The sourcing projects themselves then follow the strategic sourcing process, and the long-term plan for each category is built in category management.
How do you turn spend analysis findings into savings opportunities?
You turn findings into opportunities by matching each pattern in the data to a lever that procurement can pull. The pattern tells you what kind of problem you have; the lever tells you what kind of project to start.
| Finding in the data | Lever | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fragmentation: one need, many suppliers | Consolidate volumes and tender | 14 cleaning companies for 9 sites become one or two regional contracts |
| Price dispersion: same item, different prices | Harmonise prices, then negotiate | One laptop model bought at five prices across entities |
| Off-contract buying (maverick spend) | Enforce the contract: catalogue, guided buying, approvals | Departments buy laptops from a local shop despite a framework agreement |
| Long tail of small suppliers | Move to catalogues, purchasing cards or a marketplace | 300 suppliers each paid under €2,000 a year |
| Volume growing faster than activity | Demand management: rules, specifications, approvals | Express courier used for shipments that could go by standard service |
| One supplier for a critical item | Secure supply: second source, longer contract, stock | A single supplier for a component with no alternative qualified |
Choose the lever from the pattern in the data, not from habit: tendering a category whose problem is off-contract buying will not save money.
CIPS calls the third pattern maverick spend: “unauthorised spend often with non-approved suppliers”. The fourth is the tail, which CIPS describes as the bottom 20% of spend that usually accounts for 80% of suppliers; what to do with it is explained in tail spend management. Demand management is one of the five category management actions listed by the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in memorandum M-19-13.
The right lever also depends on the category’s position. The portfolio model Peter Kraljic published in the Harvard Business Review in 1983 sorts purchases by profit impact and supply risk. Leverage items, with high profit impact and low supply risk because many suppliers can provide them, suit tenders and consolidation. Bottleneck and strategic items, with high supply risk, call for securing supply before pushing on price.
How do you size and rank the opportunities?
You size each opportunity by applying a savings assumption to the addressable spend, then rank the opportunities by value, effort and risk. The savings rates come from the category owner’s knowledge of the market, recent quotes or past tenders. They are estimates to be replaced by real offers, not benchmarks. The example below uses a fictional company and fictional figures.
| Category | Annual spend (€) | Finding | Lever | Assumed saving (%) | Estimated saving (€) | Effort | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facilities cleaning | 1,200,000 | 14 suppliers for 9 sites, different hourly rates | Consolidate and tender | 8 | 96,000 | High: site visits, six-month tender | Wave 2, after contracts expire |
| Temporary staff | 900,000 | Contract ends in seven months; 30% booked outside it | Retender and enforce | 6 | 54,000 | Medium | Wave 1 |
| Laptops | 450,000 | Same model at five prices; 40% bought off contract | Catalogue on the existing contract | 5 | 22,500 | Low | Wave 1 |
| Courier services | 150,000 | No contract; many small invoices | One carrier contract, booked by card or catalogue | 10 | 15,000 | Low | Handled by the tail process |
| Total | 2,700,000 | about 6.9 | 187,500 |
The largest saving is not the first project: cleaning waits for its contracts to expire, while temporary staff and laptops start now because the timing and the effort allow it.
The estimates add up as follows: 8% of €1,200,000 is €96,000; 6% of €900,000 is €54,000; 5% of €450,000 is €22,500; 10% of €150,000 is €15,000. The total, €187,500, is about 6.9% of the €2,700,000 analysed. The ranking then weighs timing as much as value: a category under a contract that runs for another year is planned for later, whatever its size.
How do you measure the results of spend analysis in procurement?
You measure the results against the baseline the first analysis produced, using the same data rules at each refresh. Four measures cover most needs.
- Savings against the baseline. Separate cost reduction, a lower price or total cost than the baseline, from cost avoidance, a price increase that was refused or limited. Finance usually accepts only the first in the budget.
- Spend under management. The share of spend bought through managed contracts and channels. OMB M-19-13 sorted federal spend into tiers, from Tier 0, unaligned spending bought in a decentralised way, to Tier 3, spend through government-wide Best In Class solutions.
- Contract coverage and compliance. The share of each category’s spend that goes through a contract, and the share of invoices matched to a purchase order raised before the invoice.
- Suppliers per category. The number of active suppliers in each category, which should fall where consolidation was the lever.
The gap these measures reveal can be large. In 2012, the GAO reported that four federal departments, together 80% of $537 billion of federal procurement spending in fiscal year 2011, managed about 5% of it through strategic sourcing, while the leading companies it studied managed about 90%. These are historical figures, quoted to show what a first analysis can reveal, not a target.
How do public buyers use spend analysis?
Public buyers use spend analysis for the same decisions, and also to meet legal duties. Two examples show how the data turns into an obligation.
- United Kingdom: the pipeline notice. Under section 93 of the Procurement Act 2023, in force since 24 February 2025, a contracting authority that expects to pay more than £100 million under relevant contracts in the coming financial year must publish a pipeline notice within 56 days of the start of that year. The notice covers each public contract with an estimated value of more than £2 million that the authority intends to advertise in the 18 months from the start of that year. Knowing which contracts end and how much each category costs is a spend analysis question.
- United States: no splitting below thresholds. FAR 13.003(c)(2) says not to break down requirements that add up to more than the simplified acquisition threshold or the micro-purchase threshold into several smaller purchases merely to permit simplified acquisition procedures, or to avoid a requirement that applies above the micro-purchase threshold. Spend analysis is how a buyer sees repeated small purchases of the same item from the same supplier and checks whether they should have been one procurement.
More on public buying rules is in what is public procurement.
Questions
What is the difference between spend analysis in procurement and in finance?
Finance looks at spend by budget, cost centre and ledger account to control costs against the plan. Procurement looks at the same money by category and supplier, to decide what to tender, which contracts to enforce and which suppliers to keep. The data is shared; the questions differ.
Who does spend analysis in a procurement team?
Usually a procurement analyst or a central team prepares the data and the standard views, and category managers interpret them for their categories. Finance and accounts payable provide the data and agree the savings rules. In a small organisation, one buyer may do all of it in a spreadsheet.
What is the difference between cost reduction and cost avoidance?
Cost reduction is a price or total cost lower than the baseline, which shows in the budget. Cost avoidance is an increase that procurement prevented or limited, such as a supplier’s 8% price rise negotiated down to 3%. Agree with finance in advance how each is counted.
Where should a first spend analysis in procurement focus?
On the categories with the largest addressable spend and a decision coming soon, such as a contract that ends within the year. A rough classification of those categories is enough to start; refine the rest of the data while the first projects run.
New guides on the strategic sourcing line
One short email when a guide on this line is added or revised. Nothing else.
Coming soon: sign-up opens with the first email.